"JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t" (jawzx2)
03/09/2016 at 15:56 • Filed to: None
0
4|
"JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t" (jawzx2)
03/09/2016 at 15:56 • Filed to: None | 0
| 4 |
Surprised I haven’t seen anything about this on the Gawker network...
!!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
crowmolly
> JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t
03/09/2016 at 16:04 |
|
Do not let “polling numbers” sway you too much...
Scott
> JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t
03/09/2016 at 16:16 |
|
They must have learned math under Common Core.
|
JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t
> crowmolly
03/09/2016 at 16:41 |
|
Huh? Seriously, what do “polling numbers” have to do with this?
(full disclosure I am a Vermonter, and as such a Pro-Bernie voter, this post is about the pulled down Forbes article, and my surprise about the lack of crowing on Gawker about the corrupt mainstream media (not that i think that crowing is WRONG, just that I’m surprised it’s not present re: this))
Tekamul
> JawzX2, Boost Addict. 1.6t, 2.7tt, 4.2t
03/09/2016 at 16:49 |
|
I’m sure somebody’s cached the article somewhere.
It will turn up soon. Most likely on my FB feed.